Prevention of esophageal lesions during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation using esophageal temperature monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The use of esophageal temperature monitoring (ETM) for the prevention of esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is often advocated. However, evidence supporting its use is scarce and controversial. We therefore aimed to review the evidence assessing the efficacy of ETM for the prevention of esophageal injury. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the available literature from inception to December 31, 2022. All studies comparing the use of ETM, versus no ETM, during radiofrequency (RF) AF ablation and which reported the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDELs) were included. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 1112 patients undergoing RF AF ablation were identified. Of those patients, 627 were assigned to ETM (56%). The overall incidence of EDELs was 9.8%. The use of ETM during AF ablation was associated with a non significant increase in the incidence of EDELs (12.3% with ETM, vs. 6.6 % without ETM, odds ratio, 1.44, 95%CI, 0.49, 4.22, p = .51, I2 = 72%). The use of ETM was associated with a significant increase in the energy delivered specifically on the posterior wall compared to patients without ETM (mean power difference: 5.13 Watts, 95% CI, 1.52, 8.74, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ETM does not reduce the incidence of EDELs during RF AF ablation. The higher energy delivered on the posterior wall is likely attributable to a false sense of safety that may explain the lack of benefit of ETM. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive results.

[Intraoperative Complications in Cataract Surgery]. / Intraoperative Komplikationen der Kataraktchirurgie.

Cataract surgery is frequently and successfully performed in the developed world. The indications for the operation have shifted on one hand towards healthier patients seeking freedom from glasses and on the other hand towards more complex cases. How should the patient be informed? What complications can occur intraoperatively, and what treatment options are available for these complications?This article offers a focus on conditions such as zonulopathy and pseudoexfoliation that can pose challenges to cataract surgery. It discusses the use of specialized tools such as capsular tension rings and capsular hooks and precise maneuvers to minimize stress on weakened zonules in order to ensure in-the-bag fixation of the IOL.Furthermore, the article addresses appropriate actions towards intraoperative complications such as anterior or posterior capsule ruptures and loss of nuclear fragments into the vitreous cavity.Exploring innovative advancements, this article presents the latest alternatives for intracapsular lens fixation, such as sutureless scleral fixation and emerging lens designs in cases where there is insufficient capsular support.Ultimately, the primary objective remains delivering optimal outcomes even for complex cases, and minimizing post-surgical issues. Numerous tools and techniques are available.

A Narrative Review on Intraoperative Adverse Events: Risks, Prevention, and Mitigation.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse events from surgical interventions are common. They can occur at various stages of surgical care, and they carry a heavy burden on the different parties involved. While extensive research and efforts have been made to better understand the etiologies of postoperative complications, more research on intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) remains to be done. METHODS: In this article, we reviewed the literature looking at iAEs to discuss their risk factors, their implications on surgical care, and the current efforts to mitigate and manage them. RESULTS: Risk factors for iAEs are diverse and are dictated by patient-related risk factors, the nature and complexity of the procedures, the surgeon's experience, and the work environment of the operating room. The implications of iAEs vary according to their severity and include increased rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, increased length of hospital stay and readmission, increased care cost, and a second victim emotional toll on the operating surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: While transparent reporting of iAEs remains a challenge, many efforts are using new measures not only to report iAEs but also to provide better surveillance, prevention, and mitigation strategies to reduce their overall adverse impact.

Maximizing surgical safety: Approaches to prevent intraoperative complications in manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS).

BACKGROUND: In manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS), the occurrence of intraoperative complications is a recognized concern that can impact both surgical outcomes and patient safety. MSICS is widely practiced as a cost-effective alternative for cataract extraction, especially in resource-limited settings where access to phacoemulsification may be limited. However, it is important to acknowledge that MSICS is not entirely risk-free. Complications during the surgery can arise due to factors such as surgeon experience, surgical technique, instrument handling, and patient-specific anatomical variations. Common complications encountered in MSICS include posterior capsule rupture, corneal burns, iris trauma, wound-related issues, vitreous loss, and anterior chamber hemorrhage. It is crucial for surgeons to have a comprehensive understanding of the background and potential risks associated with these complications. This knowledge allows them to proactively implement preventive strategies, optimize surgical outcomes, and prioritize patient safety during MSICS procedures. Ongoing efforts in the field of cataract surgery aim to improve outcomes by advancing surgical techniques, refining equipment, and enhancing postoperative care. Through research and innovation, the goal is to minimize complications and achieve optimal visual outcomes for individuals undergoing cataract surgery. PURPOSE: This video discusses the possible complications and provides practical strategies to minimize the same at each step of the MSICS procedure. SYNOPSIS: The video demonstrates the potential complications that can occur intraoperatively during MSICS and highlights the significance of careful technique and practical strategies for prevention. HIGHLIGHTS: In resource-poor settings, MSICS is widely used as the predominant technique for cataract surgeries. Despite being a cost-effective alternative, MSICS offers comparable visual outcomes to phacoemulsification with low complication rates. This video emphasizes the importance of proactive measures and careful technique in preventing complications, thereby improving patient safety and outcomes in MSICS. VIDEO LINK: https://youtu.be/hOAMJpC67C0.

How to Recognize, Correct, and Avoid Intraoperative Complications During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions.

Technical complications are a leading cause of graft failure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Complications can occur during any phase of the procedure, from graft harvesting to tunnel preparation to graft fixation. Predicting potential causes of technical difficulty and developing strategies to avoid potential pitfalls can limit the number of intraoperative complications. If adverse events do occur intraoperatively, prompt recognition and treatment can lead to favorable outcomes. It is important to discuss strategies to understand potential complications and develop tactics to avoid and correct adverse events that can occur during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

How to Prevent and Manage Postoperative Complications in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using the Lateral Approach: A Review.

Maxillary sinus augmentation with a lateral approach is known to present more postoperative complications than other atrophic posterior maxilla treatment modalities because it is more invasive. These complications include infections that occur in the form of chronic or acute sinusitis. According to the literature, the frequency of these complications ranges from 3% to 5%. They can result from an inadequate management of intraoperative complications or from a poor evaluation of maxillary sinus particularities and pathology before the surgery. Therefore, the prevention of postoperative complications lies in the selection of cases that will allow for the identification and evaluation of infectious risk. Only a multidisciplinary approach that includes an implantologist, a rhinologist, and the treating physician will allow this. On the other hand, in infectious complication cases, the intervention of the otorhinolaryngologist (ENT) specialist is necessary. Based on the available literature and the author's experience, the methodology described in this article will allow for the prevention and management of postoperative complications related to this surgical technique.

Intraoperative blood pressure: could less be more?

Retrospective observational studies have reported a significant association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative morbidity. However, association does not imply causation, and whether preventing intraoperative hypotension can improve patient outcome remains to be demonstrated. In this issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia, D'Amico and colleagues meta-analysed 10 prospective randomised trials comparing low (≤60 mm Hg) and higher mean arterial pressure targets during anaesthesia and surgery. They did not observe an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality in the low target group. In contrast, they reported a statistically significant (but not clinically relevant) reduction in postoperative cardiac arrhythmia and hospital length of stay when targeting mean arterial pressure ≤60 mm Hg. These findings suggest that during most surgical cases, intraoperative hypotension is a marker of the severity, frailty, or both rather than a mediator of postoperative complications.

Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia.

Temperature regulation during the perioperative period plays an essential role in keeping patients safe while optimizing their recovery. The World Health Organization recommends preserving normothermia, identified as a core body temperature greater than 36°C, to minimize morbidity and mortality. The etiology of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH) varies in origin. Preoperative exposure, decreased ambient operating room (OR) temperature, skin exposure during preparation, unwarmed skin preparation and washout solutions, and lack of warming devices all contribute to IPH. Moreover, general and regional anesthesia blunt the physiologic response to hypothermia which originates in the hypothalamus. Postoperatively, patients with temperatures < 36°C are at greater risk for surgical site infection, increased mortality, longer length of hospital stay, higher 30-day readmission rates, among other complications. Identifying preoperative risk factors and OR practices that contribute to IPH, monitoring temperatures, and use of warming devices during the perioperative period can help to prevent IPH.

Enhance Safety in Aneurysm Surgery: Strategies for Prevention of Intraoperative Vascular Complications.

Complications during surgery for intracranial aneurysms can be devastating. Notorious pitfalls include premature rupture, parent vessel occlusion, local cerebral injury and brain contusion, and incomplete neck obliteration. These unfavorable intraoperative events can result in major neurological deficits with permanent morbidity and even mortality. Herein, the author highlights the relevant surgical strategies used in his daily practice of aneurysm surgery (e.g., aneurysm clipping with adenosine-induced temporary cardiac arrest), application of which may help prevent vascular complications and enhance surgical safety through reduction of the associated risks, thus allowing improvement of postoperative outcomes. Overall, all described methods and techniques should be considered as small pieces in the complex puzzle of prevention of vascular complications during aneurysm surgery.

Incidence of Unintentional Intraoperative Hypothermia and Its Risk Factors in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: Unintentional intraoperative hypothermia is a common complication in patients who undergo open surgery, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. However, few studies have focused on intraoperative hypothermia during oral and maxillofacial surgery. Our study aimed to analyze the prevalence and risk factors of hypothermia in patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 128 patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at West China Hospital of Stomatology between December 2020 and May 2021, and each patient was followed for at least 1-month postoperatively. Patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia, with at least 1-month follow-up were analyzed. The primary variable was intraoperative hypothermia, defined as core body temperature less than 36°C, measured using a tympanic thermometer during the surgery. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify the risk factors of unintentional intraoperative hypothermia. FINDINGS: The mean age of the 128 patients was 31.0 ± 20.9 years, and there was a male predominance (53.1%), with male to female ratio of 1.13:1. Thirty-one patients (24.2%) developed hypothermia intraoperatively. Older age (OR = 1.068, 95% CI: 1.028-1.110, P = .001), lower weight (OR = 0.878, 95% CI: 0.807-0.955, P = .002), greater blood loss (OR = 1.003, 95% CI: 1.000-1.006, P = .034), and undergoing cancer surgery (OR = 0.210, 95% CI: 0.067-0.656, P = .007) were associated with intraoperative hypothermia. CONCLUSIONS: Unintentional intraoperative hypothermia is common in patients who undergo surgery for oral cancer. Warming interventions to prevent intraoperative hypothermia for high-risk patients (older, lower weight, or more intraoperative bleeding) should be considered. Meanwhile, with careful nursing and rehabilitation instructions, intraoperative hypothermia does not lead to serious perioperative complications.

Intraoperative arterial pressure management: knowns and unknowns.

Preventing postoperative organ dysfunction is integral to the practice of anaesthesia. Although intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative end organ dysfunction, there remains ambiguity with regards to its definition, targets, thresholds for initiating treatment, and ideal treatment modalities.

Development of a cross-artificial intelligence system for identifying intraoperative anatomical landmarks and surgical phases during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Attention to anatomical landmarks in the appropriate surgical phase is important to prevent bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Therefore, we created a cross-AI system that works with two different AI algorithms simultaneously, landmark detection and phase recognition. We assessed whether landmark detection was activated in the appropriate phase by phase recognition during LC and the potential contribution of the cross-AI system in preventing BDI through a clinical feasibility study (J-SUMMIT-C-02). METHODS: A prototype was designed to display landmarks during the preparation phase and Calot's triangle dissection. A prospective clinical feasibility study using the cross-AI system was performed in 20 LC cases. The primary endpoint of this study was the appropriateness of the detection timing of landmarks, which was assessed by an external evaluation committee (EEC). The secondary endpoint was the correctness of landmark detection and the contribution of cross-AI in preventing BDI, which were assessed based on the annotation and 4-point rubric questionnaire. RESULTS: Cross-AI-detected landmarks in 92% of the phases where the EEC considered landmarks necessary. In the questionnaire, each landmark detected by AI had high accuracy, especially the landmarks of the common bile duct and cystic duct, which were assessed at 3.78 and 3.67, respectively. In addition, the contribution to preventing BDI was relatively high at 3.65. CONCLUSIONS: The cross-AI system provided landmark detection at appropriate situations. The surgeons who previewed the model suggested that the landmark information provided by the cross-AI system may be effective in preventing BDI. Therefore, it is suggested that our system could help prevent BDI in practice. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Research Center Clinical Trial Registration System (UMIN000045731).

Handling Severe Intraoperative Hemorrhage and Avoiding Iatrogenic Stroke During Brain Tumor Surgery: Techniques for Prevention of Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Complications.

BACKGROUND: Nationwide databases show that iatrogenic stroke and postoperative hematoma are among the commonest complications in brain tumor surgery, with a 10-year incidence of 16.3/1000 and 10.3/1000, respectively. However, techniques for handling severe intraoperative hemorrhage and dissecting, preserving, or selectively obliterating vessels traversing the tumor are sparse in the literature. METHODS: Records of the senior author's intraoperative techniques during severe haemorrhage and vessel preservation were reviewed and analyzed. Intraoperative media demonstrations of key techniques were collected and edited. In parallel, a literature search investigating technique description in handling severe intraoperative hemorrhage and vessel preservation in tumor surgery was undertaken. Histologic, anesthetic, and pharmacologic prerequisites of significant hemorrhagic complications and hemostasis were analyzed. RESULTS: The senior author's techniques for arterial and venous skeletonization, temporary clipping with cognitive or motor mapping, and ION monitoring were categorized. Vessels interfacing with tumor are labeled intraoperatively as supplying/draining the tumor, or traversing en passant, while supplying/draining functional neural tissue. Intraoperative techniques of differentiation were analyzed and illustrated. Literature search found 2 vascular-related complication domains in tumor surgery: perioperative management of excessively vascular intraparenchymal tumors and lack of intraoperative techniques and decision processes for dissecting and preserving vessels interfacing or traversing tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Literature searches showed a dearth of complication-avoidance techniques in tumor-related iatrogenic stroke, despite its high prevalence. A detailed preoperative and intraoperative decision process was provided along with a series of case illustrations and intraoperative videos showing the techniques required to reduce intraoperative stroke and associated morbidity addressing a void in complication avoidance of tumor surgery.

Abdominopelvic Surgery: Intraoperative Ureteral Injury and Prophylaxis in the United States, 2015-2019.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative ureteral catheterization/stenting (stenting) and intraoperative diagnostic cystoscopy (cystoscopy) may help prevent or identify intraoperative ureteral injuries (IUIs) during abdominopelvic surgery. In order to provide a comprehensive, single source of data for health care decision makers, this study aimed to catalog the incidence of IUI and rates of stenting and cystoscopy across a wide spectrum of abdominopelvic surgeries. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of United States (US) hospital data (October 2015-December 2019). IUI rates and stenting/cystoscopy use were investigated for gastrointestinal, gynecological, and other abdominopelvic surgeries. IUI risk factors were identified using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among approximately 2.5 million included surgeries, IUIs occurred in 0.88% of gastrointestinal, 0.29% of gynecological, and 1.17% of other abdominopelvic surgeries. Aggregate rates varied by setting and for some surgery types were higher than previously reported, especially in certain higher-risk colorectal procedures. Prophylactic measures were generally employed at a relatively low frequency, with cystoscopy used in 1.8% of gynecological procedures and stenting used in 5.3% of gastrointestinal and 2.3% of other abdominopelvic surgeries. In multivariate analyses, stenting and cystoscopy use, but not surgical approach, were associated with a higher risk of IUI. Risk factors associated with stenting or cystoscopy, as well as those for IUI, largely mirrored the variables reported in the literature, including patient demographics (older age, non-White race, male sex, higher comorbidity), practice settings, and established IUI risk factors (diverticulitis, endometriosis). CONCLUSION: Use of stenting and cystoscopy largely varied by surgery type, as did rates of IUI. The relatively low use of prophylactic measures suggests there may be an unmet need for a safe, convenient method of injury prophylaxis in abdominopelvic surgeries. Development of new tools, technology, and/or techniques is needed to help surgeons identify the ureter and avoid IUI and the resulting complications.

Resistive Warming Mattress, Forced-Air Warming System, or a Combination of the Two in the Prevention of Intraoperative Inadvertent Hypothermia: A Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: To prevent intraoperative inadvertent hypothermia (IIH), resistive products and forced-air warming systems are often used simultaneously. There is insufficient evidence to show whether this application is clinically more effective than a single active warming device. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy a single intraoperative active warming method with combined methods in IIH prevention. DESIGN: A randomized, prospective, experimental study. METHODS: This study was conducted between June and October 2021 in the operating room of a training and research hospital. The study sample consisted of 123 patients who underwent scheduled orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia, were young (18-64), and had an ASA risk score of I to III. The patients were divided into three groups preoperatively according to the stratified randomization technique. To prevent IIH, a resistive warming mattress was used in group 1; a forced-air warming system was used in group 2; and a combination of the two methods were used in group 3. The body temperatures of the patients were measured and recorded every 15 minutes from admission to the operating room until the end of surgery. FINDINGS: The mean intraoperative body temperature of the patients was 36.6±0.15˚C for group 1; 36.6±0.1˚C for Group 2 and 36.6 ± 0.15˚C for Group 3. There was no difference between the groups in terms of body temperature. The overall incidence of IIH was 8.1%; 9.8% in group 1, 9.8% in group 2 and 4.9% in group 3. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of IIH (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the efficacy of using resistive warming mattress and forced-air warming systems in preventing IIH. The use of both methods together made no difference in terms of IIH development.

Preoperative Identification of Patient-Dependent Blood Pressure Targets Associated With Low Risk of Intraoperative Hypotension During Noncardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is strongly linked to organ system injuries and postoperative death. Blood pressure itself is a powerful predictor of IOH; however, it is unclear which pressures carry the lowest risk and may be leveraged to prevent subsequent hypotension. Our objective was to develop a model that predicts, before surgery and according to a patient's unique characteristics, which intraoperative mean arterial pressures (MAPs) between 65 and 100 mm Hg have a low risk of IOH, defined as an MAP <65 mm Hg, and may serve as testable hemodynamic targets to prevent IOH. METHODS: Adult, noncardiac surgeries under general anesthesia at 2 tertiary care hospitals of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center were divided into training and validation cohorts, then assigned into smaller subgroups according to preoperative risk factors. Primary outcome was hypotension risk, defined for each intraoperative MAP value from 65 to 100 mm Hg as the proportion of a value's total measurements followed by at least 1 MAP <65 mm Hg within 5 or 10 minutes, and calculated for all values in each subgroup. Five models depicting MAP-associated IOH risk were compared according to best fit across subgroups with proportions whose confidence interval was <0.05. For the best fitting model, (1) performance was validated, (2) low-risk MAP targets were identified according to applied benchmarks, and (3) preoperative risk factors were evaluated as predictors of model parameters. RESULTS: A total of 166,091 surgeries were included, with 121,032 and 45,059 surgeries containing 5.4 million and 1.9 million MAP measurements included in the training and validation sets, respectively. Thirty-six subgroups with at least 21 eligible proportions (confidence interval <0.05) were identified, representing 92% and 94% of available MAP measurements, respectively. The exponential with theta constant model demonstrated the best fit (weighted sum of squared error 0.0005), and the mean squared error of hypotension risk per MAP did not exceed 0.01% in validation testing. MAP targets ranged between 69 and 90 mm Hg depending on the subgroup and benchmark used. Increased age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and female sexindependently predicted ( P < .05) hypotension risk curves with less rapid decay and higher plateaus. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that IOH risk specific to a given MAP is patient-dependent, but predictable before surgery. Our model can identify intraoperative MAP targets before surgery predicted to reduce a patient's exposure to IOH, potentially allowing clinicians to develop more personalized approaches for managing hemodynamics.